Motorcycle Safety Tips

ADSENSE HERE

Read these Motorcycle Safety Tips from John Bales Attorneys.

Nothing beats cruising down miles of open road on your motorcycle. And at John Bales Attorneys, we know that your top priority is staying safe. Our motorcycle accident lawyers realize that motorcycle accidents happen in the blink of an eye—and when they do, the consequences can be devastating.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident that was not your fault, we want to give you the experienced and caring legal representation you need to move forward with your life. To find out how our law firm can help you, call us at (800) 225-5564 or fill out a free initial consultation form.

Safety Essentials for Motorcyclists

There are a few safety tips you should keep in mind before you set off on your next motorcycle ride on Florida’s scenic highways:
  • Wear the right protective gear.
    A helmet is the most vital piece of protection you can wear, but do not stop there. For full protection, make sure you also wear:
  • Boots with ankle protection
  • Gloves
  • Goggles or a visor
  • Hearing protection (either ear plugs or ear muffs)
  • Nylon or leather riding jacket and pants
  • Know your bike.
    Before you ever hit the highway, take some time to familiarize yourself with the basic functions of your motorcycle in a parking lot or low-traffic area. Get a feel for how smooth the bike:
    • Accelerates
    • Brakes over short and long distances
    • Handles on corners
    • Shifts gears
  • Stay alert.
    Erratic drivers or irregularities in the road that get overlooked while you are driving a car may cause a serious accident when you are on a motorcycle. While riding, be on the lookout for hazards such as:
    • Intersections with low visibility
    • Merging or split lanes
    • Potholes and road debris
    • Speeding or aggressive motorists
    • Dense city traffic
Following these safety tips can help protect you in the event of an accident. But remember—accidents and serious injuries can still occur no matter how many precautions you take. If you have been involved in a serious motorcycle accident, the motorcycle accident lawyers at John Bales Attorneys are dedicated to helping you get the resolution you deserve. Call today, and let us fight for you.
ADSENSE HERE
Labels: , , , ,

Types of Injuries after an Auto Accident

ADSENSE HERE

 
Types of Injuries after an Auto Accident

Types of Injuries after an Auto Accident

Did You Suffer Serious Injuries in an Auto Accident? Call John Bales Attorneys.

Whether it is a high-speed interstate collision or a fender bender in stop and go traffic, all auto accidents can result in injuries for both drivers and passengers. While some car crash victims may walk away from accidents with just minor scrapes and bruises, others may suffer serious injuries that are life changing and require immediate medical attention.
No matter what type of injury you suffered in your auto accident, the legal team at John Bales Attorneys has the resources and the experience to help you. Our auto accident lawyers know the difficulties you are facing, and we will do everything we can to help you get your life back. Contact us at (800) 225-5564 or fill out a free initial consultation form.

Common Types of Injuries

The speed, weight, and momentum in auto accidents can cause a wide variety of injuries affecting almost every part of the body. The most common types of auto accident injuries include:
  • Back and Neck InjuriesThe back and neck are vulnerable to injury during an auto accident, which can lead to bulging or herniated discs, pulled muscles and ligaments, and whiplash.
  • Spinal Cord InjuriesRollover accidents and head-on collisions often can cause spinal cord injuries in auto accident victims. Some victims may experience partial or complete paralysis as a result of these injuries.
  • Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBIs) Seatbelts and airbags help reduce the risk of TBIs, but sometimes car accidents involve so much force that the brain impacts the inside of the skull—causing severe damage, swelling, and destruction of brain tissue.
At John Bales Attorneys, we know that not all auto accident injuries are obvious right away. In fact, some injuries may be internal and could go unnoticed for days or weeks after the accident, only to cause extreme pain and disability weeks later. That is why it is so important to seek medical attention after your accident, even if you do not think you were seriously injured.

You Are Hurt—We Can Help.

Your auto accident injuries can have a huge impact on your life. Not only is it difficult for you to return to work, you also may need months of expensive medical treatment that you cannot afford. This can be a frightening time, but you do not have to deal with it alone. Our auto accident lawyers will fight to get you the compensation you deserve for your accident-related expenses.

 

ADSENSE HERE
Labels: , , , ,

When to File an Auto Accident Claim

ADSENSE HERE

 
When to File an Auto Accident Claim

When to File an Auto Accident Claim

There Is No Time to Waste after Your Accident—Call John Bales Attorneys.

If you’ve been in an accident, the clock is ticking to file a claim for damages. And, if you wait too long, you could lose out on the money you deserve for your medical care, pain and suffering, lost wages, and other expenses.
Let’s talk about when you should file an accident claim and how John Bales Attorneys might be able to help.
In Florida, there are time limits for filing an injury claim. Depending on the nature of the accident, these time limits may vary.
For instance, if you were in an auto accident that was caused by another person’s negligence, you have 4 years from the date of the accident to file a claim against the at fault party. However, if someone involved in that same accident doesn’t have insurance or is underinsured, you have 5 years from the date of the accident to file a claim. John Bales Attorneys can help you determine the appropriate time period.
Although these time limits seem long, waiting to file could be a big mistake.
The insurance company could start building a case against you just hours after an accident, so the sooner you file a claim after an accident, the better. Because memories fade, documents get lost, and photos can’t be retaken, call the accident attorneys at John Bales Attorneys right now. We’ll investigate your case and fight the insurance company for the money and medical care you need.
Don’t take the chance of important evidence being lost forever. Contact John Bales Attorneys today, and we’ll get started on your case right away. The consultation is free and you don’t pay us anything unless we recover money for you.
Because Life Doesn’t Wait, you need John Bales Attorneys.
Your auto accident has left you hurting, unable to return to work, and facing countless medical bills and living expenses that you cannot afford. You know you need to contact a lawyer, but you are hesitant to make the call. However, the longer you wait to contact an attorney, the less likely it is that you will get the full compensation you are owed.
At John Bales Attorneys, our auto accident lawyers are familiar with Florida’s statute of limitations laws. We also know that waiting too long to file an auto accident claim often means evidence crucial to your case may be lost forever. Do not wait to get legal help—call us at (800) 225-5564 or fill out a free initial consultation form today.

Florida Statute of Limitations Laws

Like most states, Florida has a time limit on filing claims for damages. For auto accidents, this law may vary depending on several factors:
  • Auto Accidents Involving NegligenceAccording to Florida state law, the statute of limitations for filing a claim for any personal injury caused by negligence—or carelessness—is 4 years from the date of the accident.
  • Auto Accidents Involving Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist CoverageIf you are involved in an auto accident with someone who does not have insurance—or who does not have enough insurance coverage to pay for damages—the statute of limitations for filing a claim is 5 years from the date of the accident.
Although it may seem like you have a long time to file a claim, it is important to remember that the sooner we can take action, the better. The insurance company may begin building its case against you in the days or even hours after the accident. Our law firm can help make it a fair fight.

John Bales Attorneys Wants to be Your Auto Accident Lawyer

Our legal team realizes that it is not enough to be fast—we also have to be compassionate and thorough. That is why we strive to learn as much as we can about you, your family, and your accident. And while we are building your case, we will give you regular updates on the progress we are making. Let us put our experience, resources, and knowledge of the law to work for you—call now.
ADSENSE HERE
Labels: , , , ,

What to Do after Your Auto Accident

ADSENSE HERE

 
What to Do after Your Auto Accident

What to Do after Your Auto Accident

The Moments after an Accident Are Crucial—Follow These Steps.

After your car accident, you may be confused, disoriented, and in shock. Your main concern is the safety of you and your loved ones. But your actions during this time may have a major impact on your chances of getting the money you deserve.
If you were injured in an auto accident in Tampa or Orlando and are not sure about what you should do next, give the car accident lawyers at John Bales Attorneys a call. We have helped many auto accident victims move forward with their lives, and we will do everything we can to help you, too. Contact us at (800) 225-5564 or fill out a free initial consultation form.

Steps to Strengthen your Case

What you say to police and even the location of skid marks on the asphalt may be used as evidence in your auto accident claim. But if you follow a few simple steps after the accident, you can protect your health and strengthen your case:
  • Get medical attention.Even if you do not think you were seriously hurt, see a doctor anyway. Car accidents can cause internal injuries that may take time to develop.
  • Record the crash scene.Use your camera or cell phone to take pictures of the crash scene. Be sure to capture damage to your vehicle and any accident-related markings on the road. You should also take pictures of any injuries to you or your loved ones.
  • Stay silent.If you think you were at fault for the accident, do not admit it to the other driver or the police. The accident may have been beyond your control, but an admission of guilt can potentially damage your chances of getting compensation.
  • Call a lawyer.The sooner you talk to an auto accident lawyer, the better. Evidence needs to be collected right away, and if you wait too long, you may give the insurance company a head start building its case against you.

We Can Help You through This Time

At John Bales Attorneys, we know that the aftermath of a car accident can be a difficult and stressful time. You are in pain and worrying about paying your bills on time and getting back to work—legal paperwork is the last thing on your mind. That is why we want to help build your case and help you and your family get the money you are owed. Call today.
ADSENSE HERE
Labels: , , , ,

Tampa Auto Accident Attorney

ADSENSE HERE

 
Tampa Auto Accident Attorney

Tampa Auto Accident Attorney

Every single year, millions are involved in car accidents, which can cause serious injuries to drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. Car wrecks are already scary enough without having to worry about the financial, physical, and emotional injuries. You and your family may be experiencing additional hardship as a result of expensive car repairs, lost wages, and medical bills or insurance claim disputes.
If you, or a loved one, are among the nearly 200,000 people injured in Florida car accidents each year, you know firsthand how devastating an auto accident can be—no matter how “minor” it may have appeared. [Source: A Safer Florida: Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, “Traffic Crash Facts Annual Report 2012,” October 2012.]
Don’t spend another sleepless night wondering how you will pay for it all—contact John Bales Attorneys now for a free consultation.
As a Tampa auto accident attorney we have helped countless, innocent victims of car accidents  all over Tampa Bay; and we’re ready to help you.

What can you expect with John Bales Attorneys?

Care. Quality. Respect.
At John Bales Attorneys, we do more than simply review your auto accident case.
You are our priority. We take time to listen and understand the circumstances of your accident, the extent of your injuries, and how this single event has impacted your life and your livelihood.
We know that no two accidents are the same. Just as the circumstances, victims, and types of injuries differs with each car accident, so must our planning, investigation, and strategy. Our auto accident attorneys have handled car accident cases of all kinds, and are prepared to meet the challenges presented by your unique case with knowledge and experience.
As you rebuild your life, you can feel confident that the auto accident lawyers at John Bales Attorneys are working to build a strong case for you. You are never alone in the process—we are dedicated to keeping you informed of your case’s progress, and will do our best to answer any questions you may have along the way.

Are you the victim of an impaired or distracted driver?

The car accident lawyers at John Bales Attorneys are skilled at determining whether the driver who caused your accident was under the influence, distracted, or driving recklessly.
Drunk or Drugged Driving
Impaired judgment, dulled reflexes, and slower reaction times behind the wheel are a toxic combination. A driver under the influence of alcohol or drugs—including certain over-the-counter or prescription medications—can seriously injure or kill other drivers.
Distracted Driving
Multitasking is not only ineffective behind the wheel … It’s dangerous. More than 1,100 injuries (and 9 deaths) occur each day as a result of distracted driving. Accidents caused by texting or talking have received media attention, but a driver can be distracted by any number of things, including changing the radio station, operating a GPS, and even by eating or drinking. [Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, http://www.distraction.gov/stats-research-laws/facts-and-statistics.html, accessed April 20, 2015.]
Reckless Driving
When considering the term “reckless driving,” many think about drivers running red lights or ignoring stop signs. In reality, reckless driving includes a variety of offenses that put other drivers in danger, including driving more than 15 mph over the speed limit and aggressive driving. These behaviors are all common causes of serious car accidents.
If you have been the victim of an impaired or distracted driver, contact John Bales Attorneys now. Our professional experience with this type of accident may have a significant impact on the outcome of your case.

If you or someone you love was hurt in a car accident … Don’t wait—contact us now so we can start working to get you the money you deserve.

 

The national debate over security vs. privacy playing out through the disagreement between Apple and the FBI has taken another turn as a judge in Brooklyn ruled Monday that the government can not compel Apple to help the government unlock an iPhone in a similar case.
The controversy began a few weeks ago when a court in California ruled that Apple was required to build a software that would allow the FBI to bypass a security measure on the iPhone that belonged to one of the terrorists who committed the attack in San Bernardino.
Apple CEO Tim Cook responded with an open letter questioning the court’s decision on the basis that it could eventually compromise the security of all Apple users should such technology get into the wrong hands and that this decision would set a dangerous precedent for government authority in matters of privacy.
The debate Mr. Cook’s letter sparked turned into a national conversation over the balance in the U.S. between privacy and security, and the lack of laws regarding this balance in the digital age.
Although the NY case regards a drug dealer’s iPhone and not a terrorist’s, the ruling by the judge in Brooklyn will most likely help Apple with its case.
U.S. Magistrate Judge James Orenstein ruled that the 227-year-old All Writs Act signed by George Washington in 1789, which serves as the basis for the government’s case, did not provide sufficient authority for the government to order Apple to build a backdoor into the iPhone. It is the interpretation of this law that will largely determine the judge’s decision in California.
This debate Is making the country confront some very big questions. On the one hand, it seems like common sense that every person deserves to keep his or her most intimate details private. On the other hand, at a time when mass shootings are commonplace is that privacy worth our safety? Additionally, Apple’s argument is that letting the FBI into this particular phone would not only encroach on a terrorist’s privacy, but would allow the government access to all iPhones.
Ideally, we shouldn’t have to sacrifice privacy for safety. The argument between Apple and the FBI seems to be the bellwether trial in determining what, legally, takes precedence.
Aside from the ongoing court case, this debate will also take place in the halls of Congress. A Congressional hearing has been organized for March 1 at which Apple’s senior vice president and general counsel Bruce Sewell and FBI Director James Comey will offer testimony.
The hearing has been termed “The Encryption Tightrope: Balancing Americans’ Security and Privacy,” and was called to educate legislators on the best way to address the concerns of law enforcement while also protecting the privacy and security of everyday people.
The need for data security has never been greater as data breaches have become all too common in recent years. The recent attack at the University of Central Florida saw 63,000 people have their information stolen from the school, and there was nothing they could do to stop it. If you or someone you know has been the victim of a data breach, the attorneys at Morgan & Morgan would like to hear from you. You may be entitled to compensation for the information stolen from you, so fill out a case evaluation form for a free consultation to find out if you have a case.
0
0
0
Blog Categories
  • Accident and Injury 169
  • Consumer Alerts 169
  • Firm News 118
  • Car Accident 66
  • Labor and Employment 18
  • Legal Library 4
  • Nursing Home Abuse 3
  • Personal Injury 3
  • Medical Malpractice 2
  • Legal News 1
  • Debt Harassment 1
Blog Archives
2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
2015
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
2014
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
2013
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
2012
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
2011
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
2010
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
2009
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
- See more at: http://www.forthepeople.com/blog/judge-rules-government-unable-force-apple-unlock-iphones/#sthash.okWfLlG1.dpuf
The national debate over security vs. privacy playing out through the disagreement between Apple and the FBI has taken another turn as a judge in Brooklyn ruled Monday that the government can not compel Apple to help the government unlock an iPhone in a similar case.
The controversy began a few weeks ago when a court in California ruled that Apple was required to build a software that would allow the FBI to bypass a security measure on the iPhone that belonged to one of the terrorists who committed the attack in San Bernardino.
Apple CEO Tim Cook responded with an open letter questioning the court’s decision on the basis that it could eventually compromise the security of all Apple users should such technology get into the wrong hands and that this decision would set a dangerous precedent for government authority in matters of privacy.
The debate Mr. Cook’s letter sparked turned into a national conversation over the balance in the U.S. between privacy and security, and the lack of laws regarding this balance in the digital age.
Although the NY case regards a drug dealer’s iPhone and not a terrorist’s, the ruling by the judge in Brooklyn will most likely help Apple with its case.
U.S. Magistrate Judge James Orenstein ruled that the 227-year-old All Writs Act signed by George Washington in 1789, which serves as the basis for the government’s case, did not provide sufficient authority for the government to order Apple to build a backdoor into the iPhone. It is the interpretation of this law that will largely determine the judge’s decision in California.
This debate Is making the country confront some very big questions. On the one hand, it seems like common sense that every person deserves to keep his or her most intimate details private. On the other hand, at a time when mass shootings are commonplace is that privacy worth our safety? Additionally, Apple’s argument is that letting the FBI into this particular phone would not only encroach on a terrorist’s privacy, but would allow the government access to all iPhones.
Ideally, we shouldn’t have to sacrifice privacy for safety. The argument between Apple and the FBI seems to be the bellwether trial in determining what, legally, takes precedence.
Aside from the ongoing court case, this debate will also take place in the halls of Congress. A Congressional hearing has been organized for March 1 at which Apple’s senior vice president and general counsel Bruce Sewell and FBI Director James Comey will offer testimony.
The hearing has been termed “The Encryption Tightrope: Balancing Americans’ Security and Privacy,” and was called to educate legislators on the best way to address the concerns of law enforcement while also protecting the privacy and security of everyday people.
The need for data security has never been greater as data breaches have become all too common in recent years. The recent attack at the University of Central Florida saw 63,000 people have their information stolen from the school, and there was nothing they could do to stop it. If you or someone you know has been the victim of a data breach, the attorneys at Morgan & Morgan would like to hear from you. You may be entitled to compensation for the information stolen from you, so fill out a case evaluation form for a free consultation to find out if you have a case.
0
0
0
Blog Categories
  • Accident and Injury 169
  • Consumer Alerts 169
  • Firm News 118
  • Car Accident 66
  • Labor and Employment 18
  • Legal Library 4
  • Nursing Home Abuse 3
  • Personal Injury 3
  • Medical Malpractice 2
  • Legal News 1
  • Debt Harassment 1
Blog Archives
2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
2015
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
2014
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
2013
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
2012
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
2011
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
2010
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
2009
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
- See more at: http://www.forthepeople.com/blog/judge-rules-government-unable-force-apple-unlock-iphones/#sthash.okWfLlG1.dpuf

The national debate over security vs. privacy playing out through the disagreement between Apple and the FBI has taken another turn as a judge in Brooklyn ruled Monday that the government can not compel Apple to help the government unlock an iPhone in a similar case.
The controversy began a few weeks ago when a court in California ruled that Apple was required to build a software that would allow the FBI to bypass a security measure on the iPhone that belonged to one of the terrorists who committed the attack in San Bernardino.
Apple CEO Tim Cook responded with an open letter questioning the court’s decision on the basis that it could eventually compromise the security of all Apple users should such technology get into the wrong hands and that this decision would set a dangerous precedent for government authority in matters of privacy.
The debate Mr. Cook’s letter sparked turned into a national conversation over the balance in the U.S. between privacy and security, and the lack of laws regarding this balance in the digital age.
Although the NY case regards a drug dealer’s iPhone and not a terrorist’s, the ruling by the judge in Brooklyn will most likely help Apple with its case.
U.S. Magistrate Judge James Orenstein ruled that the 227-year-old All Writs Act signed by George Washington in 1789, which serves as the basis for the government’s case, did not provide sufficient authority for the government to order Apple to build a backdoor into the iPhone. It is the interpretation of this law that will largely determine the judge’s decision in California.
This debate Is making the country confront some very big questions. On the one hand, it seems like common sense that every person deserves to keep his or her most intimate details private. On the other hand, at a time when mass shootings are commonplace is that privacy worth our safety? Additionally, Apple’s argument is that letting the FBI into this particular phone would not only encroach on a terrorist’s privacy, but would allow the government access to all iPhones.
Ideally, we shouldn’t have to sacrifice privacy for safety. The argument between Apple and the FBI seems to be the bellwether trial in determining what, legally, takes precedence.
Aside from the ongoing court case, this debate will also take place in the halls of Congress. A Congressional hearing has been organized for March 1 at which Apple’s senior vice president and general counsel Bruce Sewell and FBI Director James Comey will offer testimony.
The hearing has been termed “The Encryption Tightrope: Balancing Americans’ Security and Privacy,” and was called to educate legislators on the best way to address the concerns of law enforcement while also protecting the privacy and security of everyday people.
The need for data security has never been greater as data breaches have become all too common in recent years. The recent attack at the University of Central Florida saw 63,000 people have their information stolen from the school, and there was nothing they could do to stop it. If you or someone you know has been the victim of a data breach, the attorneys at Morgan & Morgan would like to hear from you. You may be entitled to compensation for the information stolen from you, so fill out a case evaluation form for a free consultation to find out if you have a case.
0
0
0
Blog Categories
  • Accident and Injury 169
  • Consumer Alerts 169
  • Firm News 118
  • Car Accident 66
  • Labor and Employment 18
  • Legal Library 4
  • Nursing Home Abuse 3
  • Personal Injury 3
  • Medical Malpractice 2
  • Legal News 1
  • Debt Harassment 1
Blog Archives
2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
2015
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
2014
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
2013
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
2012
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
2011
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
2010
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
2009
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
- See more at: http://www.forthepeople.com/blog/judge-rules-government-unable-force-apple-unlock-iphones/#sthash.okWfLlG1.dpuf
The national debate over security vs. privacy playing out through the disagreement between Apple and the FBI has taken another turn as a judge in Brooklyn ruled Monday that the government can not compel Apple to help the government unlock an iPhone in a similar case.
The controversy began a few weeks ago when a court in California ruled that Apple was required to build a software that would allow the FBI to bypass a security measure on the iPhone that belonged to one of the terrorists who committed the attack in San Bernardino.
Apple CEO Tim Cook responded with an open letter questioning the court’s decision on the basis that it could eventually compromise the security of all Apple users should such technology get into the wrong hands and that this decision would set a dangerous precedent for government authority in matters of privacy.
The debate Mr. Cook’s letter sparked turned into a national conversation over the balance in the U.S. between privacy and security, and the lack of laws regarding this balance in the digital age.
Although the NY case regards a drug dealer’s iPhone and not a terrorist’s, the ruling by the judge in Brooklyn will most likely help Apple with its case.
U.S. Magistrate Judge James Orenstein ruled that the 227-year-old All Writs Act signed by George Washington in 1789, which serves as the basis for the government’s case, did not provide sufficient authority for the government to order Apple to build a backdoor into the iPhone. It is the interpretation of this law that will largely determine the judge’s decision in California.
This debate Is making the country confront some very big questions. On the one hand, it seems like common sense that every person deserves to keep his or her most intimate details private. On the other hand, at a time when mass shootings are commonplace is that privacy worth our safety? Additionally, Apple’s argument is that letting the FBI into this particular phone would not only encroach on a terrorist’s privacy, but would allow the government access to all iPhones.
Ideally, we shouldn’t have to sacrifice privacy for safety. The argument between Apple and the FBI seems to be the bellwether trial in determining what, legally, takes precedence.
Aside from the ongoing court case, this debate will also take place in the halls of Congress. A Congressional hearing has been organized for March 1 at which Apple’s senior vice president and general counsel Bruce Sewell and FBI Director James Comey will offer testimony.
The hearing has been termed “The Encryption Tightrope: Balancing Americans’ Security and Privacy,” and was called to educate legislators on the best way to address the concerns of law enforcement while also protecting the privacy and security of everyday people.
The need for data security has never been greater as data breaches have become all too common in recent years. The recent attack at the University of Central Florida saw 63,000 people have their information stolen from the school, and there was nothing they could do to stop it. If you or someone you know has been the victim of a data breach, the attorneys at Morgan & Morgan would like to hear from you. You may be entitled to compensation for the information stolen from you, so fill out a case evaluation form for a free consultation to find out if you have a case.
0
0
0
Blog Categories
  • Accident and Injury 169
  • Consumer Alerts 169
  • Firm News 118
  • Car Accident 66
  • Labor and Employment 18
  • Legal Library 4
  • Nursing Home Abuse 3
  • Personal Injury 3
  • Medical Malpractice 2
  • Legal News 1
  • Debt Harassment 1
Blog Archives
2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
2015
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
2014
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
2013
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
2012
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
2011
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
2010
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
2009
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
- See more at: http://www.forthepeople.com/blog/judge-rules-government-unable-force-apple-unlock-iphones/#sthash.okWfLlG1.dpuf
ADSENSE HERE
Labels: , , , ,

Liability and Compensation

ADSENSE HERE

 Liability and Compensation

Who Can I Sue?

An accident victim may be able to file a third party claim if a party aside from the other driver contributed to the accident. In some cases, an individual can seek damages from a car maker if a defective or flawed vehicle component caused a crash. Additionally, if the at-fault party was acting under their scope of employment, their employer may be liable for damages. Furthermore, victims may also file suit against a government agency or transportation authority if factors such as a poorly maintained roadway, improper signage, or irresponsible highway construction contribute to a substantial accident.

How Much is My Case Worth?

The law allows victims and their families the opportunity to seek compensation from the entity that caused the accident. Damages may include:
Medical Bills: This can include current and future expenses including hospital costs, rehabilitation, transport, and medication.
Lost Wages: If the accident causes the injured party to miss work, they may be compensated for the wages they would have earned had the accident not occurred.
Future Lost Wages: If the accident is so severe that the injured can never return to work, or must miss work for a significant amount of time, they may be entitled to wages they would have earned.
Pain and Suffering: This can include coverage for treatment of depression, anxiety, fear, and other mental injuries causing distress or mental anguish. Additionally, the injured car accident victim may be entitled to compensation for pain and suffering caused by the injury and its treatment.
Loss of Consortium: If the injury negatively alters the relations of a couple, compensation for loss of intimacy or support may be available to the aggrieved party.
Funeral Costs: If a family loses a loved one in an accident, they may be able to recover some of the damages listed above, as well as funeral costs and death-related expenses.
If you or a loved one was in a car accident and sustained a severe injury, you may be entitled to compensation beyond that which is provided by your PIP coverage. To learn more about your legal rights and how our Tampa car accident attorneys may be able to help, please complete our free case review form today.
ADSENSE HERE
Labels: , , , ,

Tampa Pedestrian and Bicycle Accidents

ADSENSE HERE

 
Tampa Pedestrian and Bicycle Accidents

Tampa Pedestrian and Bicycle Accidents

Pedestrian Accidents: Tampa is the second most dangerous major metro area for pedestrians in the country, according to a report by Transportation for America. Given the vulnerability of walkers and runners on the open road, accidents with automobiles often result in serious and debilitating injuries. Pedestrians involved in automobile accidents can suffer injuries such as broken bones, lacerations, brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, internal contusions and bleeding, and even death. Pedestrian accident lawsuits allow victims the opportunity to seek compensation for medical care, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
Bicycle Accidents: By law, bicyclists have the same rights and responsibilities as drivers; however, in some cases, drivers may disregard their duty to operate their vehicles with reasonable care, putting bicyclists at risk for serious injury. Bicycle accidents may be caused by motorists who fail to yield right-of-way to a cyclist, turn into a bicyclist’s path, or try to overtake cyclists by not allowing the proper amount of space between the car and the bicycle.
Some states have created specific protections for bicyclists. For example, Florida’s “three foot law,” requires passing motorists to leave at least three feet between their vehicle and a cyclist. If a biker is injured due to the negligence of a motorist or individual, they may be able to recover compensation through a bicycle accident lawsuit.
ADSENSE HERE
Labels: , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)